I haven't seen Juno yet. The synopsis of the movie seems good and I'm gonna watch it tonight. But the other two movies - they just suck. First I watched 'No country for old men'. The first frame itself gave me an impression that it's gonna be a real slow movie. And after watching the 'highway murder using blow pipe' [or something like that], I was pretty much sure that this movie is gonna gimme some headache. And wasn't I right? Couldn't bear the movie for more than 45 mins. Within that time, I was bored to death. Deleted it then n there.

There will be blood was a tougher nut. It's frame rate was even slower than the last one. That explains it's runtime of almost 150 mins. Another huge headache. On my patience test - it lasted for 35 mins. Just couldn't bear it any longer. I just quipped then - 'This movie is worth a Oscar'. And, wow. It's really nominated for the same. Irony. More of it - both these movies have got nominated in some 7 / 8 different categories. Weird.

It's always been like this. The movies that are highly acclaimed are the worst I've ever seen. Biggest example being - Black. This movie created such a tremor nation-wide. Everyone reacted as if this is the greatest movie ever made. But frankly, I was on the verge of tearing off every single hair on my head while watching it. Some mental movie.

As I've always said - critical acclaim should never be your reason for watching a movie. Critics are just a bunch of retards. Maybe, my taste is not as good as them or I don't have enough Grey cells to understand the beauty of such movies. But then, if I need to utilize my brain while watching a movie - what's the use of it? I mean, movies are meant to entertain us, right?